HRB

HRB Toolkit

Resource Hub
Back to toolkit
Interactive experience review
Client-side only
No saved workspace
Educational tool

Human Touch Design Review

Identify where employee experience, employer trust, or operational judgment benefit from direct human involvement.

Quick Setup
Human Touch Summary

0/12

Result

Mostly routine, automation may be sufficient

Percentage

0.00%

No

6

Partial

0

Yes

0

Warnings

3

Review flags

3

People Own Relationships. Systems Support Them.
Decision map showing support versus ownership, five duty path owner nodes, and a reminder that every phase needs one accountable owner.

Design human involvement deliberately.

Use this review to decide where explanation, trust, emotion, judgment, escalation, and follow-up should stay with people instead of disappearing into routine automation.

Six Human Touch Controls

Does this interaction benefit from explanation or education?

0/2

Does trust-building matter here?

0/2

Could emotional context affect outcomes?

0/2

Is human judgment important?

0/2

Is escalation ownership clear?

0/2

Is evidence or follow-up retained?

0/2
Sensitive Situation Checks
Design Result
Mostly routine, automation may be sufficient
0 / 12
0.00%
This interaction appears mostly routine. Automation may be sufficient if escalation and evidence expectations are still clear.

This is a human touch design review, not a CRM, ticketing system, coaching platform, approval workflow, communication engine, case-management tool, or legal, compliance, tax, coverage, or employment determination.

Human Touch Warnings

Required gaps

Review
Interaction

Workflow or interaction name missing.

Name the interaction before export.

Escalation gaps

Review
Escalation ownership

Escalation ownership is not fully clear.

Name the escalation owner before relying on the interaction path.

Evidence gaps

Review
Evidence or follow-up

Evidence or follow-up retention is not fully defined.

Define what evidence or follow-up is retained.

Overall design

Review
Review

This interaction appears mostly routine. Automation may be sufficient if escalation and evidence expectations are still clear.

Retain the human touch review export with the evidence file.

Related Resources
Employee Support Triage TreeEscalation Protocol BuilderHuman Review Checkpoint RegisterAI Readiness & Workflow Guardrail ChecklistAgentic AI Readiness ReviewAutomation Boundary ReviewGovernance Maturity AssessmentEvidence Capture LoopSOP Builder / Workflow Standardization Record
Evidence to Retain
  • Human touch design review export - Retains the local review from this static tool.
  • Interaction purpose and audience - Shows who is affected and why human involvement was considered.
  • Human owner or relationship owner - Names who owns the relationship or judgment point.
  • Escalation owner - Shows where sensitive or unresolved interactions go.
  • Evidence or follow-up record - Defines what proof or follow-up note should be retained.
  • Communication or support notes, if applicable - Preserves the explanation, education, or support path used.
  • Updated SOP, support resource, or escalation protocol, if applicable - Keeps repeated interaction patterns aligned with workflow controls.

Evidence is not saved in this static version. Assign an owner, repeat the process consistently, review exceptions, explain the rationale, and retain copies in the employer file or local project record.

Local Export Actions

No database records or server-side files are created. Use these browser-only actions to retain a local copy.

This is a human touch design review, not a CRM, ticketing system, coaching platform, approval workflow, communication engine, case-management tool, or legal, compliance, tax, coverage, or employment determination.